Skip to main content

A Hospital Nightmare.

This comes with no apology for it being entirely personal. 

On Tuesday last, I had to attend hospital for an assessment for a cataract operation - simple enough you might say. Fine, no problem with the assessment (or, normally, the operation). To get to the hospital, 13 miles away - there is no public transport from this small rural village my wife would have to take me and no way could she or I lift my wheelchair or scooter into her small car. So I contacted the hospital asking if wheelchairs are available there. Yes, no problem was the reply. 

BUT! When we got there, the only wheelchairs are large ones that have to be pushed (no self-propelled chairs). And Kate struggled pushing one with lumpen me in it. She complained of a painful back afterwards. 

Now the appointment letter told us the assessment was in Ophthalmology in the “Windsor Suite” but with no clue as to where the “Windsor Suite” is in the hospital. So I looked on the hospital website and it said Ophthalmology is just to the right of the main entrance! So we went to the main entrance reception and were directed back outside and down to another part of the hospital - true it is to the right of the main entrance but some way down from it. But we got there, with Kate still struggling. 

At Ophthalmology reception they said: oh no! you have to go to the “Windsor Suite” on the second floor of the hospital! Back we went, through the main entrance (luckily we had allowed plenty of time), around the ground floor to the lifts and along about a quarter of a mile of corridors. We eventually found it and I was parked in the waiting area.

Unfortunately, Kate then had to leave to attend to other family matters. I was left waiting in the wheelchair for about 50 minutes. HELPLESS, as I couldn’t propel the chair or do anything myself. Other people waiting were appropriately socially distanced so that was no problem. My main concern dawned on me then. If I needed to go to the toilet I couldn’t do anything about it. There was no one in attendance to ask for help. I would be left to wet or even soil myself in my helplessness! (luckily I’d had the forethought to leave off my diuretic medication that day). 

I was then seen by a nurse who wheeled me into her consulting room. In a long and thorough assessment she was excellent but a portent was hinted at. 

She then wheeled me back to the waiting area and after another long wait I was seen by a doctor who also wheeled me around himself. He too was excellent. Bad news though. I was told by the doctor there was a consensus I would have to have a general anaesthetic for the operation itself. Partially because they’d had problems with my head staying still for retinal photos (essential tremors) but mainly because they’d sussed I can’t lie straight on my back, without acute pain for the half hour the operation would take. 

The problem is in 2010 I was told by my Orthopaedic Consultant he could not operate because a general anaesthetic was far too risky because of my general shaky health. 

The upshot is that I will have to have another appointment to see the Ophthalmic Surgeon. For that, I will have to find some way to take my own wheelchair or scooter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has sen
Self Advocate’s Support and Action Group Wednesday 08 February 2023 Time: 12:30pm-2:30pm https://us06web.zoom.us/j/97471173675 Meeting ID: 974 7117 3675 1. Present Andrew Ray Olcay Russell Phil Sarah 2. Apologies: Jenny Firielle Chris Peter Vicky Andrew welcomed everyone to the meeting. Our last meeting was 8th February. 3. Check-in Andrew asked how everyone was feeling. Everyone shared how they were feeling and their news. 1 Firielle: told us about her acting work. She finished her tour with the play Milk and is now doing a performance with Dark Horse. They are currently touring. Russell: said he had just been to a face-to-face speaking up meeting, which was really good. He also told us that Joanne won the Derek Russell Award for Outstanding Leadership at the North West Self |Advocate’s conference. Peter: said he has been well. He told us about some of the jokes and play on words that he works on. He shared some that he had worked on earlier. Ray: said he has h

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether