Skip to main content

How to Bury Disable People

On 13th of this month, after reading the paper, I wrote to the EDP. In a slightly edited version made today (14th January) I said:

 

“Your otherwise excellent article in today’s EDP (13th Jan 2021) by Thomas Chapman about the lack of vaccination centres is as guilty of omission as Central Government in ignoring the existence of disabled people.

 

The Department of Health and Social Care published its ‘UK Covid 19 vaccines delivery plan’ on 11th of this month.

 

That plan says on page 40:

“A number of local authorities are already proactively working in this area, with... significant research in this area, published in December 2020 and sharing more widely within the sector. This focuses on three Cs:

 

Finding ways to reduce COMPLACENCY regarding the risks of COVID-

 

Building CONFIDENCE in the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine

 

Increasing the CONVENIENCE of being vaccinated 


...MHCLG (Ministry of Housing Care and Local Government – my insert) is funding the Community Champions Programme which will work with up to 65 local authorities across England to boost work to reach out to ethnic minority and disabled communities. This will include intensive engagement by community voices around vaccinations – learning and other resources from local activity will be shared to a wider audience.” (my emphases)

 

The above is the only mention of the word 'disabled' in the whole 47 page document and there is no mention at all of 'disabled people.'

 

Thomas Chapman also makes no mention at all of this vast and seriously vulnerable national community of people in his article!

 

COMPLACENCY indeed. And certainly undermining CONFIDENCE. Is this perhaps the CONVENIENCE in Government (and EDP) terms of burying the existence of disabled people.

 

Heddwch

 

Mike”

 

In a Parliamentary debate, “Covid-19: Disabled People” on 13th January 2021; the same day as the EDP article, Mims Davies, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for State for Work and Pensions said:

 

“ The Government are committed to supporting disabled people affected by the covid-19 pandemic. We are ensuring that disabled people continue to have access to disability benefits, financial support, food, medicines and employment support, as well as updated guidance in accessible formats. (Hansard, volume 687 ((my colour emphasis)).

 

Why is this not getting through to the EDP and the Department of Health and Social Care?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...
Post a Comment
Read more

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...
2 comments
Read more

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...
3 comments
Read more