Skip to main content

Wot A Palaver

I’m really sick and tired of this blasted curse that’s following me around.  I’m talking about essential tremors which means I’m unable to use a smart (touch)  mobile phone; or an iPad; I can’t write a long hand and I have extreme difficulty in typing. A good example of how this can obstruct social action is that I sometimes get emails asking me to mail my MP. This is just too problematic for me and I never do now (although I have a collection of several replies from the past in which he just trots out tory mantras).

This programme,  ” SpeechTexter ”  attached to Google Chrome is really valuable but frustrating at times when when it misunderstands what I’m saying and sometimes crashes losing all the text. 

I find Mac Dictation, which I have on my computer, is useless as the bulk of what I dictate comes out as unrelated nonsense. 

I’m told that Dragon Professional is the the best program to use for turning  voice into text and it will will allow you to write all sorts of documents,  including emails, by just using your voice. However, it is is prohibitively expensive for me at £294 a copy. So I’m in the process of applying for a Personal Health Budget to get one.

I’m finding that the application process is is tied firmly up in red tape and and first of all, there has to be an assessment or triage to  judge whether I’m eligible  for what the NHS terms  ” Continuing Health Care. ” after asking my GP how I went about claiming this budget I received a phone call today from a very nice lady who is a ” Social Prescriber. ”  She is employed by the district council which is unusual in itself, but she knew nothing about the budget I am seeking to apply for. She had to hang up to seek advice and when she phoned back, she told me I have to get in touch with an organisation called Beacon.

I did this online and was directed to download what they call call a Toolkit for beginning an application. Alternatively, the social prescriber said she would refer me for an adult social care assessment with a view to obtaining the the programme (extra problem here as SpeechTexter insists on USA spelling) from the ‘assistive technology department.’ 

I’m writing this as it seems to be a good illustration of how difficult it can be for disabled people to get help.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.