Skip to main content

Ill-Treatment of People with Learning Disabilities

 

There is a new report by NDTI (National Development Team for Inclusion - advocacy@ndti.org.uk) and Voice Ability, the champion for people with mental ill-health conditions and learning disabilities (https://www.voiceability.org/). Taking notice of this report  is of great urgency, detailing as it does the bad treatment afforded to our most vulnerable citizens by government and its associated institutions. Extracts say:

"Blanket decisions about access to treatment and visitors are being taken without clear justification, including enforced confinement, denying access to outdoor space or gardens, and preventing leave for people who are on mental health wards. Half of advocates reported care providers had stopped all visits and almost half (47%) reported that people were being confined to their rooms…."

and:

"A lack of understanding of people’s rights under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) is a common thread through many responses. Advocates reported serious concerns that people who do not have capacity were not being appropriately assessed. Best interest meetings and decisions were not being taken in line with the MCA. Further, some reported “restraint used unlawfully” and people being “threatened with restraint” when distressed or not wanting to be tested for coronavirus."

Everyone should be aware of the report and the human suffering it discloses.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...