Skip to main content

ROFA & NSUN

Watching the ROFA Sheffield conference online today it struck me that there are similarities with what the National Survivor User Network (NSUN - www.nsun.org.uk) has been, and still is doing, in developing a national (England) network of mental health service user led organisations. Since its own inaugural conference in 2007 the accumulation of knowledge and useable experience has been weighty and sometimes valuable. The ball has overcome the initial political and social inertia and is rolling well.

It seems a crying shame that there is a schism between NSUN and the aspirations of the Reclaiming Our Futures (ROFA) Sheffield conference. I can’t help thinking that NSUN has done much of the hard work organising and drawing together an increasing bond with many MH user led organisations (ULOs). If I’m right then ROFA must gain tremendously from joining with NSUN in their common cause. ROFA can learn a great deal to their advantage in this respect and NSUN could be a lot richer from the broadening of their social milieu with many constructive pan-disability bodies.

As a past member of the NSUN Management committee, later the Board of Trustees, I talked a good deal about NSUN’s narrow remit, pointing out ad nauseam that many MH users also had physical and sensory impairments and were also socially disabled as a result. Not a lot of notice was taken although we did establish a link with Shaping Our Lives.

It seems a shame, for example, that NSUN have, in partnership with other organisations and individuals including the National Involvement Partnership, has produced a document entitled 4Pi, Involvement for Influence (http://tinyurl.com/o6rud8l), and there is an open invitation for other organisations to critique the work.

This document, although it needs tweaking as it’s contradictory and to my mind a bit ‘mealy mouthed’ in parts, is eminently useable by ROFA and could contribute to the ambition, like at the NSUN 2007 conference, to form a National voice for disabled people.

ROFA too, has a huge advantage in that it isn’t Londoncentric. In my opinion too much (not all by any means) of the work NSUN does is in the context of the social structures and cultures of South East England and the London boroughs - they will protest that they have done a lot of work in the North East - I yield to that and it could be a good conduit.

An enthusiatic supporter of ROFA and NSUN I hope, in the near future, to do some talking to both with a view to them joining hands. I’ve posted this to both.

Mike Llywelyn.
14th July, 2015.

Comments

Mark Harrison said…
Thanks for this Mike – I have forwarded to ROFA steering group colleagues. One of the participants in the conference was saying a similar things. I agree we have to make links with the survivor movement.

Here is a link to Jenny Morris’s speech:

http://jennymorrisnet.blogspot.co.uk/

Cheers

Mark

Mark Harrison
CEO
Equal Lives

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.