Skip to main content

September Meetings

Norfolk HealthWatch AGM at the Curve, Norwich, 22nd September2014 .



The AGM was Chaired by William Armstrong the ex Norfolk Coroner. The first speaker was Doeuke Doebma the owner of Clinks Care Farm who gave a comprehensive account of care farms in general and a special account of his own organisation.

The special guest speaker was Norman Lamb who, after a matey exchange with the Chair about their early mutual experiences as lawyers in London, gave his usual warm, slithey and near meaningless talk about how the government are doing everything to improve and advance mental health services.

Time came for questions from the floor and, unusually I was chosen for the first one. I asked Norman Lamb:

“How do you reconcile your glowing rhetoric with the fact that no actions to implement it are taking place and the government is continuing to make swingeing cuts in mental health?”

In a blustered reply Mr Lamb just referred to what he had said in his talk. Disappointingly, no-one followed up my question.

I think the time is long past when we should put Mr Lamb and his DH colleagues under concerted pressure to fulfill their warm promises as couched in “No Health without Mental Health.”

æææææææææææææææææææææææ

Gt Yarmouth and Waveney CCG meeting, Beccles, 25th September 2014

In a meeting which was full to the seams with service users, carers and members of the public, the CCG's agenda included their decision about the Norfolk and Suffolk Mental Health Trust's proposals for beds and services cuts at Carlton Court hospital on the edge of Lowestoft.

For the purposes of this write up the following quote in 'Recommendations for the Governing Body to Approve,' section 6, from the CCG's final proposals is my main concern:

“Consolidate all adult mental health inpatient services on the Northgate Hospital site in Great Yarmouth which will be developed as a local centre of excellence for acute mental health services...The Governing Body should note that where there is an acute need, a bed will always be found, even if in exceptional circumstances this means a patient may be placed out of Trust area” (whole document - http://tinyurl.com/oovfot7)

My main objection to this is the acute Lowestoft mental health beds and the Lowestoft multidisciplinary team based at Carlton Court will be transferred at best, 12 miles and at worst 25+ miles out of access for the Lowestoft people with difficult and expensive public transport routes and with all the difficulty being exacerbated by getting to the point of transport.

I asked the CCG board the following questions:

Do you realise you are in breach of the 2010 Equality Act - this is: because of your proposed actions to take the acute mental health services from Carlton Court to Northgate hospital in Gt Yarmouth, you are discriminating against the people of Lowestoft?

And a rhetorical question: do the doctors on the board recognise the words: ’First, do no harm?’

My second question raised a brief comment from the chair - that he found it insulting.

Heddwch.

Mike.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.