Skip to main content

Special News from Survivors History.

Another valuable posting from Andrew Roberts of Survivor History and research (studymore@studymore.org.uk)



I managed to get to the last day of the Hackney museum exhibition


CREATIVE JOURNEYS


Responses To Mental Health in Hackney, Present and Past


12 February - 25 May



Core Arts, the group that organised this, have created a book about it. The printed version costs £30, but the e-book is free. I attach your copy.

For general survivor history see the creative journey of Frank Bangay (dealing with MPU in 1970s London and PROMPT and CAPO in the 1980s)
and the Mad Pride notes of Mark Roberts, which bring the story up to the present resistance to welfare reform.

Every story in this book is (in my opinion) worth reading many times, and every piece of art worth looking at many times. Some of the art work was much more effective in the exhibition, but I have found other pieces more effective when I looked at the book which is here on the Core Arts website


Issues relating to welfare  reform, and the survivor movement, in England have been raised by Joanna Care in the debate about psychiatric labelling on the Mad in America blog at

http://www.madinamerica.com/2013/05/hearing-voices-network-launches-


debate-on-dsm-5-and-psychiatric-diagnoses/



This starts with an important statement by Jacqui Dillon, the Hearing Voices Network chair, and includes a Press Release from Hearing Voices about debating psychiatric diagnoses. The participants also include Chrys Muirhead of Peer Support Fife, who have their own website:

http://www.peersupportfife.org.uk/ which you will probably want to read.



In her blog, Jacqui Dillon says about being hospitalised "If I wanted to get better, I "must accept my diagnosis and take medication" and then they would give me welfare benefits and a free bus pass. I wouldn´t ever recover."

It is this point that Joanna Care responds to. She says "The only point I´d take issue with you on Jacqui is "I "must accept my diagnosis and take medication" and then they would give me welfare benefits and a free bus pass", that´s often something people do not easily acquire and not a helpful statement in the current UK climate given what a judge recently said:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/may/22/fitness-work-tests-


mental-health-unfair



what research is revealing:



http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/11/benefits-


claimants-other-research



and how in addition housing issues are directly impacting on victims


of abuse:



http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/may/23/benefits-cap-


catastrophic-effect-families



A number of judicial reviews have been heard and are being sought including demands for the minster to answer for his persistent lies on statistics, so I would ask that you consider very carefully what you say on those issues given these issues are pressing very hard on some people and few survivor groups are speaking out about it, it´s the physical disability groups who have been most active. Bus passes are being taken away on grounds of "mental illness", and welfare assessments have been shown to be prejudiced against people defined as "mentally ill", and the `Work Programme´ offers no specialist support to people who have survived psychiatry"

It seems to me that there are a number of issues we could usefully discuss here in relation to forming ideas about the survivor movement in the 21st century.

[There is a lot more in the blog from Joanna and others. Please take the time to look. I have just picked out one point.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.