Skip to main content

South Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG)

Under the aegis of 38 Degrees we now have a local user group to locally prompt the text of the 38 degrees petition (http://action.38degrees.org.uk/ccg_found_o?postcode=NR14+6AJ&submit=Find+your+local+petition): “Our NHS is precious, and we're relying on you to protect it. Please do all you can to stop local health services being broken up or taken over by irresponsible private companies.


  • Protect local NHS services and consult patients properly before making changes

  • Spend money wisely and don’t do deals with irresponsible private companies

  • Adopt policies and a constitution which reflect these values”


The petition, which only covers South Norfolk, has 985 signatures to date. If you live here, please add to it.



Importantly, on Wednesday 30th January we delivered the petition to South Norfolk and afterwards met with the Chief Executive, Ann Donkin and a GP representative, Dr Jonathan Bryson. To me, and I think most of us (about 20 people), the meeting was positive with amicable overtones:


  1. I pointed out a radio report about a contractor for pothole repairs to a local authority who sub-contracted the work to someone else with the consequence of unnecessary public expense and suggested this was very likely to happen in the NHS. Ann Donkin replied that they could easily put a ‘no sub-contracting’ clause in their contracts. We said we hoped they would do this. Something to watch for.




  1. We talked about the contingency of only commissioning ‘any willing providers’ who are not-for-profit organisations such as Community Interest Companies (for example, Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust is a CIC). Dr Bryson came out strongly against this and spoke firmly in favour of commissioning private companies. He said “Anyway, there are ways around making a profit in CICs.” Ann Donkin pointed out that Foundation Trusts are profit making organisations a fact which militates against a policy in favour of not-for-profit organisations.




  1. We talked about there being more complexity in the mix than is generally understood and one of those factors is integration with adult social care. I pointed out that I had, via NCODP (Norfolk Coalition of Disabled People), been recently involved in interdisciplinary workshops looking at co-producing pathways for integration. Ann said the CCG is currently involved.




  1. As the last question, I asked what, if anything, the CCG is planning in relation to mental health training for their GPs. Dr Bryson seemed affronted by this, saying: “We have no plans, our GPs provide a perfectly good service for our mental health patients and we pride ourselves in our quality of referral.” I pointed out there is an accepted statistic which says 90% of mental health problems are treated in primary care and there are many concerns about GPs in general, with such a brief period of training in mental health, needing additional training with the advent of CCGs. Dr Bryson said: “Tell me what’s underneath this?” I said I would be in touch further when we had their contact details (Sharing of contact details had been agreed).




  1. As we were leaving I was chatting to Dr Bryson and I asked him if he knew, off the top of his head, how many Section 12 doctors (doctors, usually GPs, with special training and approval under Section 12 of the Mental Health Act 1983) there are in South Norfolk. To my astonishment, he said he didn’t know of any and “They aren’t necessary anyway.” This needs following up and I’ll do so when I have the contact details.


There was a suggestion of repeating this kind of useful meeting but no decision was made.



Heddwch.

Mike.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...