Skip to main content

Local Social Work Deficits.

The following is the copy of my e mail to the NCODP Independent Living Group who are currently investigating instances of Adult Social Care failure:

My main concern is that Norfolk 'social workers' are not working as social workers and this is not because of inadequate training - social work training is thorough and rigourous. Let me explain further: there are standards that social workers have to work to. These are set out now in the Professional Capabilities Framework (PCF) developed by the Social Work Reform Board and which replaces the National Occupational Standards issued by ToPPs in 2004. This is just one section of the PCF:

                     Intervention & Skills - Social Worker
Social workers engage with individuals, families, groups and communities, working alongside people to assess and intervene. They enable effective relationships and are effective communicators, using appropriate skills. Using their professional judgement, they employ a range of interventions: promoting independence, providing support and protection, taking preventative action and ensuring safety whilst balancing rights and risks. They understand and take account of differentials in power, and are able to use authority appropriately. They evaluate their own practice and the outcomes for those they work with.

  • Communicate with compassion and authority in challenging situations and with resistant individuals

  • Routinely explain professional reasoning, judgements and decisions

  • Engage effectively with people in complex situations, both short-term and building relationships over time

  • Gather information so as to inform judgement for interventions in more complex situations and in response to challenge.

  • Use assessment procedures discerningly so as to inform judgement

  • Develop a range of interventions; use them effectively and evaluate them in practice.

  • Expand intervention methods and demonstrate expertise in one or more specific methods relevant to your setting.

  • Make timely decisions when positive change is not happening

  • Actively support and initiate community groups and networks, including professional ones.

  • Clearly report and record analysis and judgements

  • Demonstrate and promote appropriate information sharing.

  • Use contingency planning to anticipate complexity and changing circumstances.

  • Recognise and appropriately manage the authority inherent in your position

  • Demonstrate confident and effective judgement about risk and accountability in your decisions

  • Regularly undertake assessment and planning for safeguarding


You can see at a glance that Norfolk CC social workers come nowhere near fulfilling just this one section of their PCF (as evidenced by the case examples attached here - and evidenced by many more).



It is my opinion that social workers in Norfolk are not allowed by their employer (by restrictive and managerialist practice) to operate as social workers should and I think Norfolk should be made accountable for this. Reference to OFSTED should be a first step.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.