Skip to main content

So is it deliberate perversion?

Parliamentary "Written answers" 1st October brings us this:

"Employment: Work Capability Assessment

Question

Asked by Baroness Thomas of Winchester

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many people are employed by the Department for Work and Pensions as decision makers for the purposes of the work capability assessment; and how many of those decision makers have so far received additional training as recommended by Professor Harrington in his independent review of the work capability assessment.[HL2126]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord Freud): There are 937 (2011-12 full time equivalent*) people employed by the department as ESA WCA Decision Makers.

Professor Harrington’s recommendations in respect of the training needs of decision makers in relation to the work capability assessment have been implemented in full. New learning was made available for decision makers on the WCA process and specifically on how to gather and use available evidence to make quality limited capability for work (LCW) and limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) decisions. Four additional training modules have been introduced in order to complement the existing decision-maker training routeway and allow us to respond as effectively as possible to Professor Harrington’s recommendations. To date those modules have been attended by a combined total of almost 4,000 participants.

The training needs of individual decision makers will vary according to their experience and not every decision maker will need to attend every module, but regular consideration is given to the ongoing training and development needs of every decision maker to ensure that each has the requisite skills and knowledge to make good decisions which give appropriate weight to additional evidence.

*Full time equivalent is a way of presenting a total count of staff based on contracted hours worked in proportion to those hours of full time staff (36 hours in London and 37 elsewhere). FTE is the way staffing figures are presented in departmental reports and headcount profile tables, and workforce plans."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.