Skip to main content

NTUC 2012 - Pulling together to achieve more

Was the title of the meeting at the Abbey Conference Centre, Saturday 7th July. Heading up (temp.) the new NCODP Campaign Group, I went.

The opening speaker, Clive Lewis - Norwich South Parliamentary Candidate for The Labour Party, set the scene: “Pulling together, unity is power - it is essential that all of us: political parties; trades unions; campaign organisations; voluntary organisations; community groups; members of the public - all of us should work together.”

For about the next two hours and about four more speakers, I thought I was at a Labour Party convention. Total narrow party insularity x total blinkering to anyone or anything else. Brilliant speech by Owen Jones (http://owenjones.org/about/) though.

Later, the People’s Charter workshop was good (www.thepeoplescharter.org) and I’ve contacted them to see if I can get more information for our NCODP group.

In the afternoon following a few more speakers, I found myself in a Red - Green debate: Clive Lewis again, Neal Lawson - Chair of Compass and a Green Party Norwich councillor, Dr Rupert Read.

At the start of the debate I took the chance to protest that this was all about political parties, especially a narrow focus on the Labour Party and not about “Pulling Together” as the title of the conference proclaimed, and that there had been no speaker from a voluntary or community organisation. I reminded the floor about the essential need to work with disabled people and of the existence of NCODP.

In the last workshop I was floored.

Marcus Roberts - Deputy General Secretary of The Fabian Society gathered us together and set out the results of what he said was a poll about which problems are most important for the Labour Party to prove they can resolve if they are to win the next election. The top three, he said, are:

Housing
Immigration
“Benefits Scroungers”

I set out in detail how thousands of disabled people are being as near as damnit destroyed by the benefits and local authority cuts, AND HOW THOSE PEOPLE ARE BEING FURTHER DEVASTATED BY THE STIGMA OF ‘SCROUNGER’ MYTHS AND LIES DRUMMED UP BY THE GOVERNMENT AND PROMOTED BY THE MEDIA. I THEN POINTED OUT THE REINFORCEMENT OF THAT STIGMA CREATED BY THE FABIANS’ POLICY STATEMENTS.

I proposed the Fabians should adopt a policy of positively combating the myths and lies about all disabled people being ‘benefits scroungers.’ I think Marcus Roberts noted what I said but I wouldn’t be sure.


As a last slap in the face, just before the final plenary of the conference I needed to go to the toilet. At the Abbey Conference Centre, the disabled toilet is in the old manor house which means a wheelchair trip across an uneven courtyard and up a couple of small steps. I made the trip.

When I got to the old manor house it was locked!!!!!!!!

I told the conference organiser. I then had to race home, missing the plenary!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.