Skip to main content

The New Revelation in Child Care.

There are “serious weaknesses” in the child care system, the MPs announced this morning. They have noticed that taking a child into care and placing that child in a care home across the other side of the country is cause for concern.

HAH!

In 1968 - I made my first move into social work with a job as a ‘trainee child care worker’ at ‘Gwynfa Residential Clinic for Emotionally Disturbed Children’ in Colwyn Bay, north Wales. The Clinic accepted children of age range 4 to 16 years from all parts of the UK. The Clinic was not a private concern but was run partially by the North Wales Child Guidance Service and the North Wales hospital Denbigh (a psychiatric hospital). The senior staff in charge were Registered Mental Nurse qualified.

One of the first things that struck me when I started the job was that one major reason the children were ‘emotionally disturbed’ was that they were away from home and in many cases, more than a hundred miles away from home - isolated, forcibly separated from their parent(s) and removed from their local friends.

The issue became a regularly expressed one throughout my 22 month stay at Gwynfa (I had quickly gained a ‘bad’ reputation as a rebel anyway for openly opposing some of the methods) and quite a few of the other staff ‘trainees’ talked about these things amongst each other in the privacy of the rest room - something I found to be a regular feature of my career in social work.

I went to college to train as a social worker in 1970. Entering that world I absorbed experiences via placements in what were then called ‘community homes’ (local authority children’s residential homes). Children being placed away from their own homes was regular ‘cause for concern’ then, as it was in the professional associations, including the residential workers’ association of the day. It was, in fact, a perennial item in reports about the standards of child care by those associations.

At Gwynfa we were constantly reporting that children had absconded (sometimes chasing them through the woods which surrounded the Clinic - they made a good game of it). Most weren’t seen absconding and would end up in a police station in Chester or Wrexham or even Manchester. We would then have to go and pick them up.

I also remember when later I worked as a qualified social worker in Clwyd’s Colwyn Bay office, many of the out-of-hours standby duties would involve a trip to collect a child who had absconded from a Clwyd home.

Yes, for many years it has been recognised and expressed by child care professionals that placing a child away from his/her home area is bad practice.

The Waterhouse Public Inquiry into child abuse in north Wales commented about children being exposed to child abuse when absconding. They should have taken notice then from the Inquiry report but it takes a lurid media expose now for them,the MPs to find out it is a “serious weakness” in the child care system. It must in some way be convenient for them!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...