Skip to main content

Choose and Book?? Follow Up....

The mails posted last time and these following up also appear to chime with the press reports about NHS managers allegedly using delaying strategies for surgery to save costs. Hocus pocus anyway.
The next mail was from PALS:
Good Morning
I have had your e-mail forwarded to me, I have confirmed with my colleague - orthopaedics are not exempt from national policy as patients are offered choice and have an 18 week target. Orthopaedic triage facilitates the national policy for patients to be seen within the timescale.
If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.
Kind regards
Susan Rixham
PALS Manager – NHS Norfolk
Freephone: 0800 587 4132
****************************************************
I replied straight away:
Hello Susan Rixham.
I have to disagree. Choice should begin with the GP:
"Choice of Hospital" DH July 2003.
Para 1.1.2
"Delivering the NHS plan sets out the requirement that patients and their GPs will be able to book appointments at both a time and place that is convenient to the patient. This might include NHS hospitals locally or elsewhere, Diagnosis and Treatment Centres (DCTs), private hospitals or even hospitals overseas."
National Patient Choice Survey, DH February 2010.
"Introduction.
Most patients (and I am eligible here) have a right to choose any clinically appropriate provider in England that meets NHS standards and costs on referral for their first outpatient appointment (my parenthesis)."
The triage system also cuts across Personalisation, see the information leaflet here:
http://www.personalhealthbudgets.dh.gov.uk/About/Publications/?parent=8077&child=5794
Heddwch
Mike.
=-=-=-=-=
Powered by Blogilo

Comments

its interesting and well judged analysis is reflecting in this writing.

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...