Skip to main content

"The dancers are all gone under the hill."

Dead the dream.

A few months back here in Thurlton, we suffered a rural excitement. The village shop and post office was in difficulty and the owners were faced with imminent foreclosure.

I found myself Chair of a steering group to take forward a scheme to obtain the shop and post office for ownership by the whole village. The project was to set up a Community Interest Company (a company in which all the assets are owned by the community and no individual or group can make financial gain from it).

The objects of the company were established early. These were:


  • To provide retail, postal and other services in the parish of Thurlton, Norfolk;


  • To serve as a meeting place and focal point for the community of Thurlton.


  • To promote local produce, local culture, healthier lifestyles and a more environmentally suitable community economy.


  • To provide for an information/advice/advocacy point for health and social care, disability rights, LINks contact and service user involvement.


We quickly got together a survey of total village opinion, delivering the brief questionnaires to every house by hand and collecting them a week later. Frequent personal contact with householders helped to ensure a very positive response. A subsequent public meeting was arranged and that meeting endorsed the steering group proceeding with exploring legal interim lease arrangements with the mortgage provider; setting up a Community Interest Company for the village; and applying for grants.



The hard work of realising these arrangements was about two thirds of the way through when the steering group, open to membership to all, was joined by a newcomer who had been at the public meeting and had spoken well. Unfortunately, this person is a businessman with his eye open for personal gain. He went over the steering group’s heads and made an ad hoc informal renting arrangement between himself and the owners.



He announced his own plans for the shop and post office telling us he had paid a month’s rent himself to prevent the foreclosure. I refused to have anything more to do with any agreement of this kind at that point. (The steering group had previously unanimously resolved that any lease agreement had to be between solicitor and solicitor with tight conditions that the rent would be paid straight to the mortgage company and would have a termination point of two years when the proposed village Community Interest Company would look to purchase).



The steering group staggered on for another three weeks but after that, the businessman announced he and his wife would take over the shop and post office as their own business.



“Footfalls echo in the memory


Down the passage which we did not take


Towards the door we never opened


Into the rose garden.”



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...