Skip to main content

Plaudits for Panorama Again.


One of the elements of last night’s programme hit the six-inch oval smack in the place to drive it straight home. With the OFSTED inspections of Haringay and other child protection teams, with Healthcare Commission inspections of all UK trusts there has been a huge flaw in their inspection methods (I pointed this out to the Healthcare Commission in my response to their initial strategy consultation - to no avail!). That flaw is an all but complete reliance on the managers of organisations being inspected filling in forms and reporting on themselves. Instead of the inspectorates talking to the people who use the services and the people who actually do the work.

And again we had evidence of the equivocality of such managers in the file fiddling exposed last night.

In PPlog of February 3rd this year, writing about the new Social Work Task Force set up to look at what’s wrong with social work I said:

“To make any sense whatever the members of that task force should be made up of the social work equivalent of plumbers, engineers, mechanics, carpenters. plasterers, painters and decorators - the only people who know what it is like to work hands on in the front line of social work - hampered by the bureaucratic barriers thrown up by managerialism. The elite positions and distance from actual practice of the people appointed mean they cannot even communicate easily and comfortably with those in actual practice. Sheer brain popping stupidity!!!”

And as long as this culture of overpaid, self-important managers talking only to overpaid, self-important managers exists, nothing will change.



Comments

Too true mate,

The last comment you wrote.

What is so obvious, to those of us who have been dragged through the bureaucratic bush backwards too many times, is that the likes of The Healthcare Commission (now in a muddle as it tries to merge itself into the Care Quality Commission) are the system. They are happy to perpetuate the system whilst neglecting everyone they should (in an ethical society) be serving.

In fact all they do is perpetuate the system and nothing more.

Am glad you are sticking your five pennath in because I often get beyond dealing with these hangers on and dream of a day when we get a government that actively encourages overseeing bodies to serve the public and not be pre-occupied with the brand new old boys club of managment (which might include girls these days but is no different than it ever was).

I didn't get to see the documentary but hear there is another on tonight...think it is Channel 4... about 'Britain's Lost Children'. Would assume it is going to give an objective and honest perspective of what is happening in care homes.

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...