Skip to main content

Regional contradictions

The following is an extract from a Department of Health letter dated 29th January, 2009 to all trusts and strategic health authorities throughout England
“Responding to what really matters to patients - support for embedding involvement and engagement. 
Over the last few years, the NHS has made progress towards fully engaging people in the design and delivery of services. All major policy drivers, including the High Quality Care for All, World Class Commissioning, Local Involvement Networks (LINks) and the Draft NHS Constitution, make it clear that we must carry on embedding this good practice in all that we do.
The Department is currently considering how best to support the NHS and support key partners and stakeholders so that it can
facilitate true patient and public empowerment across all health services”
However, as we know, in Wales “patient and public empowerment” has been retained in the form of the old Community Health Councils which, in England were replaced by Patient and Public Involvement Forums in 2003 with the latter being replaced by Local Involvement Forums (LINks) in 2008.
But while the Department of Health appears to be promoting and expanding “patient and public empowerment” in England, Wales seems to be working to reduce and diminish it. This is their latest:
Proposals on the future of Community Health Councils in Wales
Dissolution of the existing 19 Community Health Councils (CHCs) in Wales;
Functions, structure and membership of the seven new CHCs; (Welsh Assembly Government statement 2009)
This means they are going to do away with any local patient and public involvement, moving the councils further away from any possibility of ordinary people who know from direct experience the strengths and weaknesses of their health and social services taking part in those councils. More particularly the proposals will effectively prevent (by moving to fewer councils further away) disabled and ‘hard to reach’ people from involvement.
What happens with cross-border services and joint working will be something of a conundrum.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...