Skip to main content

Norfolk LINks Progress

Norfolk LINks - The interim core group have called it Norfolk LINk but in my opinion the structure will only work at all effectively as a series of local community networks, not as a single county wide Local Involvement Network - so I insist on the plural.

The interim core group and the interim host (Voluntary Norfolk), from the end of May on made a very good start working actively in partnership with the host to set up some early strategies and policies (should have been from 1st April but the county council were, IMHO, tardy). I think in particular, the Code of Conduct produced is excellent and could be a model for others (I am currently updating ppeyes and will be including a copy of core documents there).

My own involvement began in July with inclusion in the “Improving Access to Psychological Therapies” LINks group. This was interrupted by the scandalous temporary loss of my driving licence (see earlier blog entries) but I’m now back in the loop and we had an excellent presentation last Friday from the Norfolk PCT and during that meeting they made a solid commitment to full and proper service user and carer involvement in its developments. We will now closely monitor that commitment.

Very relevant to the work on IAPT is “World Class Commissioning” and by request I have produced a summary for others involved in Norfolk LINks.

We also had a good meeting with the mental health trust to review last year’s PPI report. Looks like very positive partnership and there was consensus to repeat the review in January - hopefully with Social Services representation too then. Facilities for children is one area where the trust are behind.

There is a plethora of LINks work being thrown up and requests from NHS sources for LINks representation for Equality and Diversity, governance topics, AIDS and HIV, ICD coding, etc are coming up regularly in the LINks e mails. I have expressed interest in some of these but the host is saying they are having hosts of volunteers for each and they are operating a policy of first come first served.

Coming up is a conference next week on Mental Health and Ageing and included in that will be an exploration of the Mental Health Act 2007 (now fully implemented except for advocacy) and The Mental Capacity Act. There are too some interesting new PCT duties in respect of patient safeguards. Following close on the heels of that conference will be a meeting with the Healthcare Commission.

All in all, I’m impressed with how well Norfolk LINks have taken off. But there is one area where things are dragging and that is the centrally important function of making contact with local communities and reaching people who are hidden. Holding public meetings in five large towns around Norfolk is nowhere near adequate - we must reach out into small local communities - go out to people - not expect them to come to us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.