Skip to main content

Final Police Disability Forum Correspondence.

Got this:

Mike
cc all other people emailed.
 
I am sorry that you have chosen to misinterpret the content and spirit of my email. Following my visit to you on 16th May, we both agreed we could be open with each other. That agreement seems to be interpreted by you in a very one-sided way. In the light of your comments, I see no point in continuing the exchange.
 
On behalf of the NPA and its Disability Forum, I accept your resignation.
 
Chris Harding MBE LL.B Solicitor
Chief Executive
Norfolk Police Authority

My reply:

Hello Mr Harding.

A typical middle class bureaucrat's response and whitewash!! How on earth could I have been more open and straightforward? Mealy mouthing is your province, not mine.  Well let this working class disabled service user tell you: you had no choice mate - my decision. But you can bet your life you've not heard the last of me. 

Heddwch

Mike.

Comments

That's not my name! said…
Hi Mike

Reading through correspondence.

From what I am picking up, the biggest concern from those running the forum was that you have a blog and are prepared to have views you share on it.

Sucre bleu!

As my mate said to me...only today..the more you speak out the more the system will try and exclude you.

When you get the 'we are not obliged to' spiel you know you have paid professionals, getting tax payers' money, to do the bureaucrats dirty work for them!
20 October 2008 at 18:21
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...
Post a Comment
Read more

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...
2 comments
Read more

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...
3 comments
Read more