Skip to main content

Safer Neighbourhoods Arses Panel

A really effective object lesson in how to very successfully prevent public expression and the reporting of adverse incidents.

Up to now the SNAP (Safer Neighbourhoods Action Panel) meetings have been a great development in police-public relations and community cohesion. Last night at Hobart High School in Loddon the new style of SNAP was launched - the police safer neighbourhoods team with its Action Panel was conflated with the South Norfolk Council East Rivers community meeting. IT WAS A SHAMBLES. We had:


  • constant reminders that the functions of the SNAP were not those which had operated previously with no explanation who had changed the rules so arbitrarily and without consultation;



  • the majority of the Panel sitting in the audience with just a tribunal which acted like an inquisition in its communications with the members of our communities;



  • former members of the SNAP who had been “taken off” the Panel without explanation - the one who spoke up about this was the local Minister;



  • a police representative on the tribunal whose attitude was bombastic and bullying. He very rudely cut a well respected member (a woman) of the Loddon community short when she was starting to relate incidents of stone throwing and damage, telling her this was not what they wanted to hear When challenged he later apologised for any offence caused but it was too late by then the repression had been successful . He prefaced the meeting by dogmatically announcing that anything that happened between 12 midnight and 8am was no business of the SNAP;



  • an agenda which was couched in strict artificially bureaucratic items which were nebulous to the general public;



  • disregard for proper access by vulnerable people to a public meeting - anyone with learning difficulties would have been much more demeaned, insulted and stifled than the people at the meeting were;



  • a chair of the tribunal who appeared to be in complete ignorance of what the SNAP is about.




I have written previously, impressed by a positive community initiative that, in spite of some early glitches, was getting better and better. It’s a great shame these Safer Neighbourhoods Arseholes have sabotaged this.

There is a very good guide: Neighbourhood Policing, Neighbourhood Team Guide which was published by the Home Office, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, ACPO, the Local Government Association and the Association of Police Authorities in 2006. an extract from this Guide says:


The public's sense of safety and their confidence in the police are as important as reducing crime and disorder. With our partners we need to work with communities not only to make neighbourhoods safe, but to make them feel safe too. Here, the citizen's perspective matters more than any other. To really understand neighbourhoods and the issues that concern local people we must see the world through their eyes. This is critical in relation to hard to reach/hear groups so that no group is inadvertently excluded. To do this we need to listen - really listen to the people who live with the problems - understand, act and feed back. (my emboldening)


Perhaps someone should get one for last night’s tribunal members.

Comments

Unknown said…
Well done Mike! Sgt. Aldis did say that he thought the meeting was not a success.
To me that seems like a bog standard meeting of any bureaucratic entity.

They don't want to be doing something different, like letting the public make any choices, do they?

Wouldn't be British that!
Anonymous said…
Well done. Your thoughts are mine completely. The Police Sargeant was very demeaning and rude. It makes me not want to come to future meetings but maybe that's what they want? It was me that tried to intervene in the stone throwing and fortunately another member of the public came forward to help. Once again many thanks.

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...