Skip to main content

BLINk and you'll miss it.

Here in Norfolk’s ‘Empty Quarter’ we’ve - at last, two months late - finally had access to information about what is happening about LINks in this county. Unsurprising I suppose, given the local authority it is!

The information comes via an initial newsletter from ‘Voluntary Norfolk’ - not, you will note, Norfolk County Council. And although NCC can argue that the interim LINk is independent and once established it was their responsibility to inform the public, I still have extant a second stage complaint about their behaviour before 1st April. Essentially this is about their incompetence and disregard of members of the public without means or opportunity to get access to their paltry two centralised preparatory meetings (remember they were given £10,000 by central government to set LINks up).

And, basically because I simply don’t trust the ‘business’ mindset not to wheel and deal on the margins of legitimacy, I’m still waiting for copies of the contracts and the tendering process.

Nevertheless, the information we now have about Norfolk’s interim LINks (the host will not be in place before September this year) is, on paper, nicely positive. The Newsletter says:


  • “The Interim LINk will be made up of 2 groups: a Core group of up to 20 members (similar to a decision-making Board); and a wider LINk membership where volunteers or reps from social care groups can opt in and out of Working Groups. Working Groups will focus on making sure results are achieved on specific issues or projects.”


and


  • KEY ACTIVITIES




  • NHS Norfolk Commissioning services - One representative sits on each commissioning programme board. Representation will be reviewed as the way the boards work become clearer.


Women & Children’s Health


Planned Care
Unplanned Care
Mental Health, Learning Difficulties & Substance misuse
Long Term Conditions
End of Life Care
Primary Care

Drugs & Therapeutics


  • Discharge Working group




  • Equity of services Working group -         Mental health services for older people & non-drug therapies




  • Communications Working group




  • Continuing PPI Health Working groups - Ambulance - District Nurses Out of Hours - 2 Core members - Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (Norwich) - 6 LINk members and 1 Core member -James Paget University Hospital (Gt Yarmouth) - 14 LINk members and 1 Core member - Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Kings Lynn) - 5 LINk members and 1 Core member.“


In addition, no thanks to NCC, I now have e mail contact with Lucy Love, Manager - Interim LINk Host for Norfolk (Voluntary Norfolk). Her responses have been refreshingly swift, informative and friendly and I’m hoping to become, belatedly, involved.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

Mental Health Labels?

I read this valuable little report yesterday. It presents issues and dichotomies around disability labels, models of disability and rejections of the disability label by mental health service users/survivors. The report makes positive recommendations about furthering the debate but, in my opinion, the user contributions muddy rather than clarify matters. The subjects are seminal to the work being carried out to integrate physically, sensory, mental health and intellectual disabilities - essential if we are to progress further in our strivings for human and statutory rights. For me, the report is enormously helpful in providing a foundation for discussions of what are important questions and perhaps, if properly distributed, it could bring a better focus towards some resolution. Heddwch. Mike.