Skip to main content

The Smell Intensifies

Today’s letter to Norfolk county Council (see blog entry 30.04.08.):

Head of Law,
Norfolk County Council,
County Hall,
Martineau Lane,
Norwich,
Nr1 2UU.

Hello.

Formal Complaint 2nd attempt.



I sent the attached formal complaint dated 30.04.08. On that same day. The letter was sent 1st class and Mr Hayman’s office would have received it the next day. The letter was not marked confidential nor did it have any other marking.

Your complaints policy states: “The complaint will be acknowledged by letter or email within five working days of receipt of the complaint by the Council. The standard for giving a substantive response is 15 working days from the date of acknowledgement. The target for meeting this standard is 95% of complaints. The acknowledgement letter will include an explanation as to the action being taken and by whom.”

I have received no acknowledgement.

The official LINks Guide No 7 says: “The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 makes clear that Local Authorities must make arrangements for LINk activities to take place from 1 April 2008. This is to ensure that there is no ‘gap’ between the abolition of Patient Forums and the start of LINks. Local Authorities that have not procured a Host by 1 April must make other arrangements to ensure that LINks activities can take place during a ‘transitional phase’. The transitional phase can last up to 30 September whilst the Local Authority tries to find a suitable Host organisation.”

Guide No 7 also says:

“What activities should be undertaken in the transitional phase?

It will take time to establish effective LINks, but in transitional areas Local Authorities (or other transitional Hosts) can help emerging LINks take a number of steps to help them get going. These include:


  • deciding governance and accountability arrangements – agreeing roles and responsibilities within the LINk and accountability to the wider LINk membership;



  • setting clear aims – LINks are expected to ask every section of the community for their views and experiences, particularly providing a platform to those who might not often have their voice heard; LINks will be more successful if everyone involved has a shared vision;



  • encouraging a broad membership – Local Authorities need to ensure that their “getting ready” activities involve a wide cross-section of the population,



  • particularly involving recipients of social care services, and carers, not just health care groups;

  • agreeing first priorities – priorities should be determined from feedback from local people and groups across health and social care; Patients Forums will be abolished in March, but their previous priorities should be considered alongside those of all other groups engaged within the LINk;



  • developing policies and procedures – including making decisions about priorities for the work plan, a code of conduct about LINk ‘enter and view’ powers, handling conflicts of interest and whether volunteers will be paid expenses;



  • mapping existing activity – creating a community profile, including ‘easy to ignore’ individuals and groups to identify – and avoid duplicating – what is already happening in the community to find out what works and where gaps exist;



  • developing an engagement plan – raising awareness of the LINk, creative mechanisms for community engagement and participation, together with relationship building with key local stakeholders, such as commissioners and providers; and



  • agreeing a LINk work plan – ensuring that there is a clear mechanism for setting priorities for the work programme, remembering that LINks are about health and social care.


In areas where Local Authorities are in transition, LINks will need to be supported to undertake these initial activities. Their activities should be carefully documented, ready to be handed over to the proper LINk once it is established.” (my emboldening)



At the point of this second formal complaint I would also like to point out that I had also requested a copy of the draft host contract. I have heard nothing.

Heddwch,

Mike Cox.

c.c. Tony Tomkinson, County Councillor for Clavering.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...