Skip to main content

replies to 'inappropriate'


There had to be a couple of mail exchanges with PCX not committing themselves to many words. These are the mails:

“Hi Mike
 
Thanks for posting that. The comments box for blogs has a character limit which your response went over. I have fixed in the back end of the system and posted your reply.
 
Comments and forum posts will get refused automatically if there is inappropriate language as the T&Cs and Guidelines state.  
 
Feel free to publish my reply!
 
Best wishes

Paul”

I then mailed back:

“Hello Paul.

The moderation policy says:

    *  Conduct and use of language - Your comments should be within the scope of the topic under discussion. Comments should be civil and tasteful, and must not be malicious or designed to offend. Swear-words and profanity will not be accepted.
    * No reference should be made to the personality of other participants nor should attacks be made on an individual's character.
    * Legal liability - You should remember that you are legally responsible for what you write. By submitting a comment you undertake to indemnify the National Centre for Involvement against any liability arising from breach of confidentiality or copyright, or any obscene, defamatory, seditious, blasphemous or other actionable statement you may make.
    * Advertising, spamming and research - All must be relevant to the subject of discussion.
    * Propriety and moderation - Comments used for party political purposes will be removed. 
    * Don’t impersonate or falsely claim to represent a person or organisation. Please don’t mislead other users by abusing our registration procedure. 

I can't see any of that in my response to Laura!! Unless it is perceived by others as uncivil or in bad taste and surely that's wholly subjective and not possible to measure?

Can't see any word/character limit. Should you state one up front? 

Heddwch

Mike.”

And the final say from PCX:

“Mike
 
Certainly.   I'll add about length of comments this afternoon.  Many thanks for pointing it out.   We don't want members getting frustrated when their comments aren't accepted.
 
Many thanks again and best wishes
 
Paul”

There is a response too from Laura on her PCX blog (see below for the address) along with comprehensive comment about service users on Boards which sounds to me like mandarin. I’d love you to have a look and tell me what you think, especially if you’re a service user - and it would be really valuable if more service users registered with PCX (free) and fed into what Laura is doing.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

website

Just a confirmation of the search for a website host and my website ppeyes will be back on line. The functions are the same - as an independent monitor of how patient and public involvement in health is working with the addition of looking at how LINks will be set up (if they indeed are set up at all). This blog will be used for comments on current activities and developments closely allied to the website. As soon as the site is up and running I'll provide a link. Activities have extended further since ppeyes was taken off line (because it was criticising a government department - more later) in September 2005. I'm now active in service user campaigning and, being a disabled National Health Service User myself, in disability rights.

Appeal for Users' ATOS Stories

Mental Health Resistance Network: Judicial Review  Members of the Mental Health Resistance Network (MHRN) have been working with a solicitor towards making a claim for a Judicial Review of the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) which is the assessment used to determine whether we will be granted Employment Support Allowance or sent back to work (if there is any work to be found!). MHRN are just focussing on people who claim on mental health grounds.   MHRN are now at a critical stage in this process as they are very close to being able to make the claim for Judicial Review. However, before theycan do this, it would help if they could find stories that will show the court what sort of problems the WCA causes. So they are looking for people who have been through the process and would be able to tell us about their experience. If people wish, MHRN can present their cases anonymously when they use their evidence. Although it ...

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...