Skip to main content

local doings

The James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust held its first AGM on Monday evening.

Justifiably, the Trust's many achievements were proudly reported to those present. BUT. Sadly, almost despairingly, those present, maybe 50-70 people, were, overwhelmingly, professionals, clinicians and administrators. Service Users (their term Patients) were in a minority of, as far as I could see, under 5%. Class and status rules! The suits well to the fore (and yes, well could be a verb too and I'm not apologising for the golf pun)!

As I said, the Trust's achievements are undeniable, and applause for those - but the whole concept of foundation status is to enhance the Trust's democratic operation - how many members has it? Their document says
The membership as at 31st March 2007 is 9,759 Public Constituency and 3,367 Staff Constituency giving a total membership of 13,126
I don't really have to say any more.

But I will. Communication with its Public constituency, certainly from my own standpoint, has been practically non-existent. As a member, I've heard nothing pro-actively from the Trust since it was awarded foundation status. This is illustrated by the fact that the first time I set eyes on their April 2007 edition newsheet Trust News (the latest?) was when I picked it up at the AGM. I only knew of the AGM because I happened to spot a small advert in the local paper. There was no member notification.

At Foundation Trust inception details were taken from all those on line. I specified e mail as my preferred communication method - nothing!!!

It was very pleasing to see a separate presentation on Equality by the Deputy Director of Human Resources, Liz Cooke. And it was an excellent presentation.

But would this not have been more pertinent, escaping the these days common criticism of tokenism, if the presentation had been by a service user?

And why, afterwards, did I have to point out there was no provision for people with sensory difficulties at the AGM and that I could not, being landed myself with single sided deafness, hear people speaking at the other side of the room because there was no microphone provided.

My Equality questions also included (as nothing was mentioned in the presentation):

(a) What is the Trust now doing, since it made no provision in its initial constitution for representation - to network with mental health organisations, especially in the light of current national concerns about the neglect of people with mental health problems who also have physical medical needs, with the aims of raising staff awareness of mental health, ensuring appropriate medical treatment and promoting rights under the Disability Equality Duty.

The Chairman of the Trust, John Hemming, addressed this from the stage saying:

1. they have regular lines of contact with the Norfolk and Waveney Mental Health NHS Trust;

2. they have regular contact with the Norfolk Mental Health PPI forum;

3. that staff are, at present, attending a meeting about Learning Difficulties!!!

(b) What is the Trust doing about ensuring the private and independent companies the Trust commissions observe the Trust's Disability Equality Scheme?

Liz Cooke said she thinks there is a procurement clause in the DES but she will check this and raise awareness.

To their credit, the Trust say they already have a continuing group of
local disabled representatives to ensure their views and concerns were captured in our planning. We are now working together on our action plan for the coming year.

John Hemming publicly invited me, as Chair of the Norfolk Police Disability Duty Forum, to join this group and, in the interests of good networking, I agreed. However, Liz came over to speak after the AGM and suggested my presence in the group be deferred as they are in the middle of some current issues.

Watch this space.

Comments

Andy Robinson said…
Sounds like once again authorities like to be seen to be making the right noises, but when a Knowledgable person asks questions they are found out. My only response is are they going to get away with it or are you willing to report them to the DRC for not following the D.E.D and their own D.E.S.

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...