Skip to main content

Norfolk County Council being tardy

Still no named LINks person for Norfolk CC. Received this today:

Norfolk is one of the Local Authorities I am chasing at the moment as we
have still not received a named contact from them. I will forward it on as
soon as I receive it.

Kind regards

Florella Baker
Policy Officer/ BCLO
Responsiveness and Accountability Branch
Experience and Involvement
Room 502A
Skipton House
80 London Road
London SE1 6LH
Tel: 020 7972 5324

"Developing policies that promote a culture of responsiveness and
partnership; involving people and communities to improve their experience
of health and social care."



Mike Cox
rnet.com> cc:
bcc:
25/07/2007 15:07 Subject: LA LINks named contacts





Hello Florella Baker.

On 1st April I sent you this e mail:
---------------------------
With regard to the mail forwarded below (LiNks contacts), can you please
tell me who the `named contact` for Norfolk County Council is.
--------------------------

You replied:
-------------------------
Norfolk County Council have not yet submitted to us their named contact for
the procurement of LINks. I will forward this to you as soon as I receive
this information.
-------------------------

It is now almost five months on. Has Norfolk still not submitted a named
person and if not is there some sanction to deal with the omission?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has se...
Post a Comment
Read more

The DLA and Workfare Scandals.

This ConDem Coalition is exploiting the apparent helplessness of disabled people by taking essential money away from them and forcing vulnerable people, for example, people with mental health difficulties. I remember, when I was a practising social worker, the horror experienced by service users when they received a letter summoning them to undergo a medical examination (25 miles away in Norwich). Some became absolutely terrified at the prospect and the stress of having to get to and face the appointment led to one or two relapses and hospital admissions. Against local authority policy, I always took them to the appointment, went in with them and supported them through the interview acting as advocate. The doctors at these reviews were employed by the Benefits Agency and usually retired from practice. They were also usually empathic with the service user and mostly helped to reduce the terror of the interview. The new 'Workfare' reviews which every DLA claimant will have to und...
2 comments
Read more

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether...
3 comments
Read more