Skip to main content

User Led History

Found this interesting piece in my archives:

A National Federation of Service Users and Carers.

In the run up to the legislation that set up PPI the Government commissioned a scoping report from a consortium of service user and carer organisations under the aegis of the Patients’ Forum. That scoping report (which the Government subsequently studiously ignored) recommended the formation of a National Federation of Service Users based on the Netherlands model. The Scoping Report said:

“Netherlands

In 1981 the Dutch Government published a policy document on patients’ rights. It concluded that patients’ rights as such without a social context did not mean very much. They needed to be linked to patient education and to the participation and involvement of citizens in the health care system.[ii] A national federation of patient and consumer organisations (NP/CF) was set up as a coalition of consumer organisations, patients’ organisations and organisations of elderly people in1992.

Aims

The aims of the Federation are to:

•Promote freedom of choice as the prerequisite of informed consent,

•Define the needs of patients and carers from their point of view.

•Provide a voice for many organisations and interest groups that represent groups whose voice is not normally heard at the highest political level.

Activities

The Federation:

•Offers a wide range of information in the form of books, leaflets and newsletters through a national network of information centres and services.

•Co-ordinates the strategies of interest groups to ensure that their efforts are not scattered but focussed on certain goals. Publishes an annual report, which receives widespread media coverage and there are also plans to produce ratings of hospitals’ performance against patient-defined standards.

•Integrates citizens and users’ views in order to promote quality from a patients’ point of view. The Federation works as an equal partner with the Dutch Royal Colleges and the Hospital Association in developing guidelines for good practice.

•Has funded research studies and is producing a handbook for health professionals pointing up the gaps between what patients want and what professionals provide.

The Federation have made some powerful interventions over the years. They went to court to protect patients affected by a strike of doctors and nurses, as a result there was a court ruling about what was and what was not allowed during strikes. They also organised a boycott where a hospital department was considered unsafe. As a result of the publicity the number of patients dropped by 80% in a week and management was forced to take immediate action.
Membership

There are about 50 organisations in membership, mainly umbrella organisations that represent general consumer interests, disease related interests and thematic or issue related interests (such as pensioners, children, women’s groups or alternative therapies). All these interests are drawn together in the NP/CF. The Federation recognises the different functions that members have and encourages collaboration rather than competition between members. There are about 2 million associated members.

Provincial structures

The national structure is mirrored by 30 Provincial Patient Councils, which draw together patient and consumer interests at this level, each council runs their own complaints and information desk. Provisional structures cover a population of 400,000 - 600,000.

•Insurers and local health providers are required by law to have formal “patient/user councils”.

•Hospitals and insurers offer places on boards and committees to patient representatives as good practice.

Patient representatives are also involved in complaints committees as a legal requirement. The Federation, the Royal College of Physicians and the National Hospital Association meet on a joint board that supports and runs a national network of patient/consumer advice centres in the community and complaints bureaux in hospitals (required by law). Patients register complaints and are advised how to take them forward, if necessary support and/or mediation will be provided. If the patient is not satisfied the patient/consumer bureaux will follow up the issue on their behalf.

Legislation

Legislation, including a declaration of patients’ rights, is enshrined in the civil law. There is a Medical Contract Act that outlines the rights and duties of patients and doctors that is a basis for conduct. A series of laws have been passed which give formal recognition to the rights of patients to meaningful participation in decision-making at every level of healthcare and to the systematic provision of high quality information as the key to involvement, freedom of choice and quality of services.

Funding

Funding from the Dutch Ministry of Health.

Comments

Before the coalition was set up, the user lobby was scattered and ineffective in the Netherlands. The government supported the coalition because it was a way of bringing some equity between professionals, third-party payers, consumers and other interests.[iii] Graham Lister concludes: ‘What is perhaps most striking about the Dutch system is that the government has conferred on the NP/CFÊ the status of equal partner in a triangular relationship between the purchasers and providers of health services and the recipients of those services - the patients and their carers. They are seen as key contributors to the system of checks and balances for the protection of patients’ rights. The Dutch model of patient and public involvement can be seen as a facet of what they call the “Polder Model” of society in which consensus is achieved in an empowered community.’

Key features for the success of the Federation are considered to be:

•NFPCO crosses the divide between Government and the voluntary sector making a strong collective voice

•It does not try to speak for all patients but enables different groups to speak through them

•The patient/public participation system is based on a legislation giving clear rights and powers. The Experience of the Federation is that goodwill is not enough.

•Patients and consumer groups are well funded by the States.

•The Federation is able to provide a strong collective voice in the media.

Further information: http://www.npcf.nl/menu/i_engels.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has sen
Self Advocate’s Support and Action Group Wednesday 08 February 2023 Time: 12:30pm-2:30pm https://us06web.zoom.us/j/97471173675 Meeting ID: 974 7117 3675 1. Present Andrew Ray Olcay Russell Phil Sarah 2. Apologies: Jenny Firielle Chris Peter Vicky Andrew welcomed everyone to the meeting. Our last meeting was 8th February. 3. Check-in Andrew asked how everyone was feeling. Everyone shared how they were feeling and their news. 1 Firielle: told us about her acting work. She finished her tour with the play Milk and is now doing a performance with Dark Horse. They are currently touring. Russell: said he had just been to a face-to-face speaking up meeting, which was really good. He also told us that Joanne won the Derek Russell Award for Outstanding Leadership at the North West Self |Advocate’s conference. Peter: said he has been well. He told us about some of the jokes and play on words that he works on. He shared some that he had worked on earlier. Ray: said he has h

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether