Skip to main content

One answer - Andy's comment.

Well Andy. One of the routes this kind of discrepancy comes to light is via trade union representation. And one of the actions the union can take, always with the permission of the employee represented - never without, when a particular case has been resolved is to flag up the problem with the concerned bodies. I would say the union in that instance has a duty to report the problem to the commissioning body, whether the union would agree with that point of view is something I'm currently pursuing.

The other obvious course is via employees who are brave enough and have enough conscience to make their own concerns known (whistleblowing). All of these private commissioned companies should have a clear whistleblowing policy. But the difficulties here is employees' lack of knowledge about how they can be protected, and the law, The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, has too many getouts for employers.

In the early 1990s I worked (amongst others), alongside Karen Jennings, now the health lead for UNISON, to help set up the organisation Freedom to Care. Karen then was influential in building some recognition of this being a legitimate recognised and needed activity as was the then Manufacturing Science and Finance Union, and I wrote the Free Expression of Staff Concerns for the British Association of Social Workers - adopted as policy. But the Government of the time watered down the content of the legislation (the PID Act) which could have answered many questions. However, I raised this again a couple of years ago with the Committee on Standards in Public Life and they assured me they now had it on their (admittedly crowded) agenda and I understand there is some pressure in Parliament to revise the legislation.

I know this leaves us currently still in a poor position vis a vis the profit grabbing companies who are flooding in to take over public functions from our elected bodies and which our current Government is backing to the hilt and promoting, but we are in a much better position than we were 15 years ago and it is a case of consistently continuing to plug away on as many levels as we can.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SURVIVOR HISTORY NEWSLETTER

>From Andrew Roberts Secretary Survivors History Group http://studymore.org.uk/ studymore@studymore.org.uk telephone: 020 8 986 5251 home address: 177 Glenarm Road, London, E5 ONB Survivor History Group Summer 2012 Newsletter The July London meeting of the Survivors History Group will be held on Wednesday 25.7.2012 from 1pm to 5pm at Together, 12 Old Street, London. Everybody is welcome and refreshments will be provided. The September meeting has had to be moved from a Wednesday to Thursday 27.9.2012 (subject to approval by this Wednesday's meeting) because of the availability of a room at Together.   -------------------------------------------------------------------- The agenda for the July meeting will be drawn up at the beginning of the meeting, but it will include Peter Campbell's regular report back on the research he is leading on the history of Survivors Speak Out and discussion of material received from other people about Survivors Speak Out.  Rick Hennelly has sen
Self Advocate’s Support and Action Group Wednesday 08 February 2023 Time: 12:30pm-2:30pm https://us06web.zoom.us/j/97471173675 Meeting ID: 974 7117 3675 1. Present Andrew Ray Olcay Russell Phil Sarah 2. Apologies: Jenny Firielle Chris Peter Vicky Andrew welcomed everyone to the meeting. Our last meeting was 8th February. 3. Check-in Andrew asked how everyone was feeling. Everyone shared how they were feeling and their news. 1 Firielle: told us about her acting work. She finished her tour with the play Milk and is now doing a performance with Dark Horse. They are currently touring. Russell: said he had just been to a face-to-face speaking up meeting, which was really good. He also told us that Joanne won the Derek Russell Award for Outstanding Leadership at the North West Self |Advocate’s conference. Peter: said he has been well. He told us about some of the jokes and play on words that he works on. He shared some that he had worked on earlier. Ray: said he has h

inappropriate!!!

I tried to respond to a Patient Citizen Exchange blog by Laura Greene today. I said: Hello Laura. Welcome - and my admiration? for you "single-handedly representing the entire health voluntary sector and 1000+ PCX membership..." My first question has to be: what is the composition of the Strategic Advisory Board? And my second question: what proportion of service users to professionals is there on that Board? There are indeed millions of impatient citizens out there. They are called Service Users (primarily because 'Patient" carries the labels 'One that has things done to her/him'; 'One that is subservient to the "We know what is best for you" approach'; 'One that is at the wrong end of an imbalance of power.' etc). The Americans prefer the term 'consumers', but whatever, we should avoid the term with the negative connotations. I was listening to the 5 Live debate this morning on the Strictly Come Dancing row about whether